Sunday, December 2, 2012

Rob Zombie VS. John Carpenter


After watching the complete theatrical version of Rob Zombie’s Halloween and the Kentucky Theater, I would like to do a comparison between characters in this version and John Carpenter’s original version. Let me start by saying, I though Rob Zombie’s new version had a decent start, but I soon changed my mind while sitting in the theater. The first aspect of the film to really bother was when Zombie was illustrating how the young Michael Meyers was twisted at young age due to an abusive family and bullies at school. I did not like this because it took the supernatural mystery out of the character; it made him very human, and easy to sympathize with. That is part of what made John Carpenter’s very original, because you knew nothing about Michael Meyers other than the way he killed his sister as a kid, and has been in a mental institution ever since.
    Another way that Rob Zombie’s remake fails is his adaption of the Laurie Strode character. In the original Laurie was a leader, she way easy to identify with, and easy to care for. In the new version I could not identify with the portrayal of Laurie. She was just an annoying school girl. Sure, she wasn’t sexually active and didn’t drink like the original Laurie Strode, but that wasn’t enough to feel for her character. She was very obnoxious and immature, even for a high school girl. Carpenter’s Laurie was very mature and calm, and easy to believe in. Sadly, Rob Zombie ruined the ending of this film by making a terrible mistake in the horror drama. He lost my interest in the main character. By the end of the movie I could care less whether Laurie lived or died, preferably the latter if it got her of screen quicker. This is a classic mistake in the slasher film genre. It is sad that Rob Zombie did not approach these characters in a different way, the film might have been more enjoyable, even with a standard horror movie plot.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment