Short Bus was a very exploitive film that dealt with all
different types of sexual frustration and exploration, but was it
sexploitation? It could easily go both ways depending on the viewer. Either way
it is an interestingly realistic portrayal of sex in film. I hate sex scenes in
most film, except maybe some select horror films, because it is very fake. All
the cleverly shot romantic scenes make it look so artificial; in fact I find it
easy to laugh at. In Short Bus, the sex was just down right believable. I would
not be surprised at all if you were to tell me that many of the actors were
truly having sex or engaged in a sexual relationship. So that brings out the
big question, is it pornographic? In my opinion, it is not, but that does not
mean it isn’t exploitation. Is a film like “I Spit on Your Grave” pornographic?
Not at all, but it is still exploitation. Now there is still a particular type
of person that may find either of these films pornographic and sexually
arousing, but I don’t think either could appeal to the normal human being. Now
just because something is sexually exploitive doesn’t make it wrong, just
possibly inappropriate or offensive. I would not suggest Short Bus to children,
or those sexually embarrassed or repressed. Short Bus could be very enjoyable
and enlightening for the correct audience though. One aspect I really enjoyed
is that it has something to exploit everyone’s sexual interests. There is a
character for just about every sex act or sexual orientation you could think
of, which makes it all the more exploitive. As I stated before though, there
still is some substance here along with deep characters rich in conflict. Short
Bus may not be sexploitation in the classic Russ Meyer sense, but there’s a
little something to offend everyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment